Compare sources
Line up what three papers or reports agree on and where they contradict each other.
Use Case
A workspace in Lunas Lab for running a health investigation — sources, data, notes, and conclusions in one place instead of forty browser tabs.
The opportunity
A serious health investigation outgrows chat fast. Three review papers, a folder of lab PDFs spanning two years, a spreadsheet of tracked symptoms — and the key insight from week one buried somewhere in a scrolled-away conversation.
Lunas Lab keeps the investigation intact. A project holds the sources; phases break the question into stages; each Stethos run is saved with the files and notes it drew on. Ask where the evidence conflicts, what changed between the March and June panels, or what a paper's limitations section actually concedes — and the answer stays filed where you can find it.
Lab output is groundwork, not a verdict: whatever it surfaces still goes to the expert — or the clinician — who owns the decision.
Where Lunas fits
Stethos helps explain, organize, and investigate. People and qualified professionals stay responsible for the decisions that follow.
Line up what three papers or reports agree on and where they contradict each other.
Work with two years of confirmed lab values inside the same project.
Turn a vague concern into defined assumptions and specific things to verify.
Every finding stays linked to the file and conversation it came from.
A practical workflow
A repeatable path makes the model easier to supervise and the result easier to trust.
Name the question and what would change your mind.
Upload the papers, reports, and data files the question depends on.
Run focused Stethos sessions per phase — patterns, gaps, contradictions.
Write up what you found and take it to the expert who can act on it.
Product path
Lunas.One is available to individuals today. Team & Enterprise workspaces and a governed Stethos API are in active development — the roadmap below is directional, not a promise of present availability, and larger deployments will require the right privacy, security, evaluation, and human-review controls.
Available in Lunas
Team, Enterprise & API direction
Questions
Yes, for the groundwork. Upload papers into a Lab project and Stethos can summarize them, extract recurring themes, and flag where findings conflict — with the sources kept alongside so you can check every claim. It doesn't replace reading the primary source; it makes the first pass and the bookkeeping much faster.
No. Lab works on files you bring — papers you have access to, reports, your own data. It doesn't search or license journals for you, so citations and access rights stay your responsibility.
Not directly. Lab output is investigation support, not clinical validation. Anything that would change a patient's care needs review by the responsible professional and whatever regulatory or quality process applies.
Try the product
Use Lunas for information and organization, then involve a qualified professional whenever a health decision is needed.