Work the literature
Compare uploaded study reports and papers in one project.
Industry
What individual pharma professionals can use today — evidence reading, terminology, patient-education drafting — with governed team tooling on the roadmap.
The opportunity
A medical-information specialist gets asked about an interaction buried across three study reports and a label. The evidence exists; assembling and explaining it under time pressure is the work.
With an individual Lunas account, that specialist can load the documents into a Lab project and work through them with Stethos: what each source says, where they differ, how to phrase the answer plainly — then run the result through the medical-review process the company already requires. The same applies to a writer turning approved material into readable patient education.
What pharma organizations ultimately need — approved-content boundaries, review queues, audit — is roadmap territory; today Lunas sharpens the individual professional.
Where Lunas fits
Stethos helps explain, organize, and investigate. People and qualified professionals stay responsible for the decisions that follow.
Compare uploaded study reports and papers in one project.
Draft readable versions of approved material for proper review.
Keep sources, notes, and conclusions attached to each question.
Recognize adverse-event content and route it to pharmacovigilance.
A practical workflow
A repeatable path makes the model easier to supervise and the result easier to trust.
Upload the reports, papers, and approved documents in scope.
Use Stethos to summarize, compare, and surface open questions.
Produce plain-language output for the accountable reviewer.
Safety, quality, and promotional questions go to their owners.
Product path
Lunas.One is available to individuals today. Team & Enterprise workspaces and a governed Stethos API are in active development — the roadmap below is directional, not a promise of present availability, and larger deployments will require the right privacy, security, evaluation, and human-review controls.
Available in Lunas
Team, Enterprise & API direction
Questions
No. Prescribing decisions require a qualified professional with the full patient context and current product information. Lunas helps professionals read, organize, and explain evidence — the clinical call is never the software's.
No. Pharmacovigilance runs on validated processes with defined human responsibilities, and Lunas is not a reporting channel. Its useful role is upstream: helping a professional recognize and organize information before handing it to the safety team.
Not in today's product — that control is core to the planned enterprise offering, which is why the current individual product shouldn't be treated as a validated pharmaceutical knowledge system. Today, professionals work with the documents they upload themselves.
Try the product
Use Lunas for information and organization, then involve a qualified professional whenever a health decision is needed.